| 对人大解释《香港基本法》的法律思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓敏贞. 对人大解释《香港基本法》的法律思考[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2006, 19(3): 22-24 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓敏贞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学法学院,广东,广州,510275 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 大陆与香港具有不同的法律传统。香港回归后,全国人民代表大会先后对《香港基本法》进行了三次解释,从而引发了各方的争议。对人大释法的权限与程序的合法性进行法律分析,人大三次释法符合一国两制下的法律解释体系的要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律解释 香港基本法 解释权 争议 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-1500(2006)03-0022-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-05-20 |
Legal Opinion on the Event that National People''''s Congress Explained the Basic Law of HKSAR of PRC |
| |
| DENG Min-zhen. Legal Opinion on the Event that National People''''s Congress Explained the Basic Law of HKSAR of PRC[J]. Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators, 2006, 19(3): 22-24 |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Min-zhen |
| |
| Abstract: | Since HongKong came back to China,National People's Congress(NPC) had explained the Basic Law of HKSAR of PRC three times,and these events have given rise to great disputation.It is necessary to analyze the validity and rationality of the interpretation of the Basic Law by NPC.By analysis, the NPC has the power to interpret the Basic Law. |
| |
| Keywords: | the legal interpetion the Basic Law of HKDSAR of PRC the right of interpetion controversy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
