作为纠纷解决模式的执行和解规范化研究——兼评最高院指导与参考案例两则 |
| |
引用本文: | 谢文哲,宋春龙. 作为纠纷解决模式的执行和解规范化研究——兼评最高院指导与参考案例两则[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2013, 0(6): 72-77 |
| |
作者姓名: | 谢文哲 宋春龙 |
| |
作者单位: | 华东政法大学法律学院上海200050 |
| |
摘 要: | 执行和解是和解这一纠纷解决模式在执行阶段的应用,具有独立的地位,旨在解决执行名义之后产生的“二次纠纷”。我国现行执行和解属于“形式的执行和解模式”,在实践应用中存在诸多问题。完善我国的执行和解,应当承认其“私力救济”的独立地位,允许当事人对执行和解协议提起诉讼,保障当事人诉权。
|
关 键 词: | 执行和解 私力救济 二次纠纷 纠纷解决 |
The Study of the Standardization Conciliation of Execution within the Remark on the two Cases of Supreme Court |
| |
Affiliation: | (XIE Wen-zhe, SONG Chen-Long) |
| |
Abstract: | The Conciliation of Execution is the application of reconciliation in the execution phase, which has independent status, aiming at settling the second dispute. In our nation, there are many problems existing in the Conciliation of Execution which belongs to Formally Execution Conciliation. In order to improve the Execution Conciliation, the parties should be able to sue the contract of execution conciliation. |
| |
Keywords: | Conciliation of Execution Self-Protection Second Dispute Dispute Settlement |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|