首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

各国立法上违约金性质比较研究
引用本文:郭丹云. 各国立法上违约金性质比较研究[J]. 河北法学, 2005, 23(6): 148-152
作者姓名:郭丹云
作者单位:河北理工大学,河北,唐山,063009
摘    要:违约金诞生于罗马法,至今理论界仍存在很大分歧,这集中表现在两大法系对惩罚性违约金的态度上。我国合同法第114条对违约金性质做了专门规定,但在理论上依然有一些问题引发争论。如何吸收两大法系的经验,及时完善我国违约金制度,避免国际贸易中的合同条款因违背各国的国内强行法而无效,实有必要对各国违约金的性质进行比较研究。

关 键 词:违约金  惩罚性  赔偿性
文章编号:1002-3933(2005)06-0148-05
修稿时间:2004-12-15

The Research of Comparative Law about the Nature of Liquidated Damages in Different Countries
GUO Dan-yun. The Research of Comparative Law about the Nature of Liquidated Damages in Different Countries[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2005, 23(6): 148-152
Authors:GUO Dan-yun
Abstract:Liquidated damages for breach of contract originated from Roman Law.But great differences are still existing in theory till now.Especially the nature concerning liquidated damages are in heated discussion which is manifested by the attitudes toward punitive penal clauses of the Continental Family and the Common Law System.Concrete regulations are made regarding liquidated damages for breach of contract in article 114 of PRC Contract Law 1999.But many issues in theory have an effect on the application of the law. As a result,it is necessary to make the research of comparative law about the nature of liquidated damages in different countries either from the point of summing up the experience of the two big Law Systems for perfecting Chinese liquidated damages system or from the point of avoiding the invalidity of the contract items running counter to the binding law of other countries.
Keywords:liquidated damages for breach of contract  punitive  compensative
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号