| 对我国陪审制的理性思考--从比较两大法系国家陪审制生存条件的视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗智勇,冯浩. 对我国陪审制的理性思考--从比较两大法系国家陪审制生存条件的视角[J]. 时代法学, 2004, 2(3): 58-63 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗智勇 冯浩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学;湖南大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于法律传统和人文环境的不同,陪审制在英美法系国家与大陆法系国家以不同的形式存在.英美法系国家实行的是陪审团制,而包括我国在内的大陆法系国家实行的则是参审制.我国不具备陪审团制生存的条件,而参审制式的陪审制的施行绩效又不如人意.面对这一现实状况,我们不能再进行简单的选择和取舍,而应该进行制度的重新架构.
|
| 关 键 词： | 陪审制 陪审团制 参审制 应然选择 |
On the Thinking about Chinese System of Assessors |
| |
| Luo zhiyong,Feng hao. On the Thinking about Chinese System of Assessors[J]. Presentday Law Science, 2004, 2(3): 58-63 |
| |
| Authors: | Luo zhiyong Feng hao |
| |
| Abstract: | Because of the difference of legal tradition and humanism, jury system shows different form in anglo-american law system and continental law system. Different to the jury system of anglo-american law system, people only act as an assessor in a law case in the continental law system which Chinese style belongs to. Jury system couldn't find suitable environment in Chinese legal system, but the performance of Chinese jury system-acting as an assessor in a law case doesn't satisfied. Facing this reality, we couldn't only make simple choice but rebuild the construction of the Chinese jury system. |
| |
| Keywords: | the system of assessors jury system the mixed system of judges and assessors natural choice |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
