| 我国反垄断立法规制对象的取向选择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 侯富强. 我国反垄断立法规制对象的取向选择[J]. 现代法学, 2000, 22(6): 55-58 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 侯富强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 深圳大学,深圳 518002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国反垄断立法规制对象是以规制行为为取向 ,还是以规制结构为取向 ,理论界多有争论。本文从美、日等国反垄断法规制对象的变化 ,我国经济发展的现状得出 :选择行为主义规制垄断是我国反垄断立法的最佳、也是必然选择。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断 行为主义 结构主义 规制对象 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2397(2000)06-0055-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-10-02 |
The Best Option for Anti-monopoly Law |
| |
| HOU Fu-qiang. The Best Option for Anti-monopoly Law[J]. Modern Law Science, 2000, 22(6): 55-58 |
| |
| Authors: | HOU Fu-qiang |
| |
| Abstract: | It has caused many arguments in China theoretical circles that the legislation on anti-monopoly should be geared to regulating behavior or regulating structure. According to the status quo of the economy development and the changes of regulating object in legislating anti-monopoly in Japan and the United States, a conclusion may be drawn that behaviorism is the best option for the anti-monopoly legislation in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | anti-monopoly behaviorism structuralism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
