首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

行政诉讼证明标准研究
作者单位:中国政法大学法学院,中国政法大学
摘    要:目前学界尚未在行政诉讼证明标准的概念问题上达成共识。对于行政诉讼证明标准内涵的界定,应该从证明标准与法律真实、自由心证和证明责任的关系入手。本文通过比较两大法系行政诉讼证明标准的特点及赖以存在的正当性基础,在坚持法律真实、自由心证和正当程序理念的基础上,提出在区分一般情况和特殊情况的前提下,重构我国行政诉讼证明标准体系的建议。

关 键 词:行政诉讼  证明标准  法律真实  自由心证  证明责任

Research on the Standard of Proof in Administrative Litigation
Xie Zhiyong. China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing. Research on the Standard of Proof in Administrative Litigation[J]. The Journal of Law & Medicine, 2008, 0(4)
Authors:Xie Zhiyong. China University of Political Science  Law  Beijing
Affiliation:Xie Zhiyong. China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088
Abstract:Until now, the legal community has not reached an agreement about the concept of "standard of proof"in administrative litigation. To define the connotation of standard of proof in administrative litigation, we should set about from the relationship between standard of proof and legal truth, discretional evaluation of evidence and burden of proof. The paper, based on insistence with the conceptions of legal truth, discretional evaluation of evidence and due process, makes the proposition of restructuring the system of standard of proof in administrative litigation under the premise of division of normal and special situations,through comparing the features and the valid bases of the Common Law and Civil Law systems.
Keywords:Administrative litigation   Standard of proof   Legal truth   Discretional evaluation of evidence   Burden of proof
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号