| 法律推理的客观性及其实现条件 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李桂林.法律推理的客观性及其实现条件[J].政法论丛,2008(3):72-75. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李桂林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学法律学院,上海,201620 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪西方法理学经历了从法律确定性向法律不确定性的转向，以“唯一正确答案”为核心的法律确定性难以成立。然而，这并不会影响法律确定性所追求的限制权力这一政治目标的实现，恰当阐释的法律客观性观念可以作为法治的基石。共同的社会文化背景、适当的法律推理思维方法、成熟的法律职业共同体三者的共同作用将为法律推理的客观性的实现提供保障。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律推理 客观性 确定性 不确定性 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-6274(2008)03-072-04 |
The Objectivity of Legal Reasoning and the Conditions for Its Realization |
| |
| Li Gui-lin.The Objectivity of Legal Reasoning and the Conditions for Its Realization[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2008(3):72-75. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Gui-lin |
| |
| Institution: | Li Gui-lin (Law School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620) |
| |
| Abstract: | In 20 century western jurisprudence has witnessed the turn from the conception of legal determinacy to that of legal indeterminacy, legal determinacy based on “the only fight answer” thesis has been proved to be unreasonable. The turn of conception, however, doesn＇ t influence the realization of the goal of limiting the political power of the state. The objectivity of law can become the foundation of the rule of law. Common background of social culture,fight method of legal reasoning, and legal professional community will warrant the objectivity of legal reasoning. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal reasoning objectivity determinacy indeterminacy |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
