Severity of Partner and Child Maltreatment: Reliability of Scales Used in America's Largest Child and Family Protection Agency |
| |
Authors: | Amy M. Smith Slep Richard E. Heyman |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Center for Forensic and Family Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK;(2) Forensic Psychology Practice, The Willows Clinic, Birmingham, UK |
| |
Abstract: | This paper describes two studies investigating the interrater agreement of severity scales for family maltreatment used in America's largest child and family maltreatment agency: the U.S. military's Family Advocacy Program (FAP). The USAF-FAP Severity Index is a multidimensional rating system for clinicians' evaluations of the severity of seven forms of family maltreatment: partner physical, emotional, and sexual abuse; child physical, emotional, and sexual abuse; and child neglect. The first study evaluated the reliability of the scale as it is used in the field. The second study compared a generalizable sample of clinicians' ratings to an established gold standard of what the ratings should have been. The Severity Index demonstrated fair-to-good levels of reliability, suggesting that with minimal cost, investigating caseworkers can routinely assess, and make fairly reliable ratings of, the severity of seven forms of family maltreatment for each case they investigate. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|