首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

仲裁庭独立性原则思考
引用本文:黄铭. 仲裁庭独立性原则思考[J]. 中共山西省委党校学报, 2013, 36(4): 81-83
作者姓名:黄铭
作者单位:广东商学院,广东广州,510320
摘    要:我国仲裁独立性原则及相应的法律法规还停留在保障仲裁机构独立性的层面,忽视了对仲裁庭本身作为仲裁契约性主体的独立仲裁权的认定。目前,仲裁机构的管理模式实际上是一种异化的模式,仲裁员的聘任及选定制度,极大地限制了当事人意思自治,使得仲裁的契约性失去了赖以存在的根基。完善仲裁庭独立性原则,必须实行仲裁机构管理制度的行政性剥离,明确取消内部仲裁员制度,变强制性的"仲裁员名册制度"为推荐制,正确界分仲裁机构与仲裁庭的性质与职责范围,真正实现仲裁活动的应有价值。

关 键 词:仲裁庭  独立性  行政性

Thoughts of the Principle of Independence of the Tribunal thinking
HUANG Ming. Thoughts of the Principle of Independence of the Tribunal thinking[J]. Academic Journal of Shanxi Provincial Committee Party School of C.P.C, 2013, 36(4): 81-83
Authors:HUANG Ming
Affiliation:HUANG Ming ( Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320)
Abstract:The principle of arbitration independence and related laws and regulations in China are still on the level of arbitration institution independence, and the independence of the arbitration tribunal itself as the contractual arbitration body is more or less neglected. Current management of arbitration institutions is run under an alienation pattern, where the appointment of arbitrators severely limit the autonomy of third party and therefore eliminate the contractual basis of arbitration. To improve the independence of tribunal arbitration, the administrative management of tribunal institutions must be terminated, the internal arbitrator system needs to be revoked, and the mandatory "arbi- trators system" must be replace by a recommendation system. The value of arbitration can only be realized when the characteristics and target of responsibilities of arbitration tribunal and arbitration institutions are rightly separated.
Keywords:Tribunal  Independence  Administrative
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号