| 我国民事证据制度的模式选择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘振铭,马乐明.我国民事证据制度的模式选择[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2012,25(4):70-72. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘振铭 马乐明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 天津市第一中级人民法院,天津,300090
2. 天津市滨海新区汉沽人民检察院,天津,300480 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法定和裁量实际上代表了两种不同的模式——法定证据制度和自由裁量制度。文章以这两种证据制度为参照物,客观分析我国民事证据制度模式的现状,进而从法定与裁量的角度入手,探寻适合我国国情的民事证据制度模式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法定 裁量 民事证据制度 模式 |
Mode Selection of the Civil Evidence System in China |
| |
| LIU Zhen-ming,MA Le-ming.Mode Selection of the Civil Evidence System in China[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2012,25(4):70-72. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Zhen-ming MA Le-ming |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Tianjin No.1 Intermediate People’s Court,Tianjin 300090; 2.Hangu People’s Procuratorate,Binhai New District,Tianjin 300480,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The legal and discretion actually represent two different modes：legal evidence system and discretionary system. Taking the two evidence systems as reference, the article objectively analyzes the current situation of the mode of China＇ s civil evidence system, and then explores the mode of civil evidence system suitable for China＇ s national conditions from the point of view of legal and discretion. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal discretion civil evidence system mode |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
