Battered women who kill |
| |
Authors: | Marilyn Kasian Nicholas P. Spanos Cheryl A. Terrance Suzanne Peebles |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, Carleton University, K1S 5B6 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | This study assesses acquital rates using mock jurors in cases involving a battered woman charged with killing her husband. The simulated trial format was based on actual courtroom proceedings including witness cross-examination and jury deliberation proceedings. The type of plea entered was varied and reflected either self-defense, automatism, or a hypothetical plea of psychological self-defense. The severity of abuse incurred by the defendant was also varied along with expert testimony. Jurors more frequently found the defendant not guilty when a plea of automatism was entered compared to a plea of self-defense. The frequency of acquittals following a plea of psychological self-defense resulted in more acquittals than the self-defense plea but significantly fewer than the automatism plea. The likelihood of acquittal increased under conditions of severe abuse as opposed to moderate abuse. Expert witness testimony was observed to influence verdicts during juror deliberations. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|