| 论“受委托”型贪污罪主体 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄俊平. 论“受委托”型贪污罪主体[J]. 江西公安专科学校学报, 2003, 0(4): 17-21 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄俊平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于贪污罪的构成特征尤其是贪污罪主体的范围一直是我国刑法理论界及司法上争论的热点,我国现行<刑法>第382条第2款规定的"委托"应只包括对国有资产的"承包"与"租赁"两种形式,不包括"聘用"形式;刑法意义上的"委托"既不同于民事委托,也不同于行政委托;该款中的"管理"、"经营"符合从事"公务"的两个判断标准,因此其具有从事公务的法律性质;对国有资产的承包、租赁可按承包与租赁者人数划分为四种类型,"受委托"人员的范围在不同类型中,其确定的原则也不尽相同;"受委托"人员不属于我国<刑法>第93条规定的国家工作人员的范畴.
|
| 关 键 词： | 委托 从事公务 国家工作人员 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8121(2003)04-0017-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-04-11 |
On Corruption Offence Subject of "On Commission" |
| |
| Huang Jun-ping. On Corruption Offence Subject of "On Commission"[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 2003, 0(4): 17-21 |
| |
| Authors: | Huang Jun-ping |
| |
| Abstract: | The constitutive features of the corruption offence, especially the range of the corruption offecnce subject, have always been the focal point in the circles of the criminal law and the justice of law. the commission described in 2 nd item of Article 382 of Criminal Law in 1997 should not include engagement but contracting in and tenancy; it is different with civil or administrative commission ; administration and management in the item accord with the judging standards of being engaged in public affairs,so the character of them is engaging public affairs ;the range of the commission is different in each type of contracting in and tenancy ;this kind of subject of Corruption Crime should not be regarded as state personnel described in Article 93 of Criminal Law. |
| |
| Keywords: | commission being engaged in public affairs state personnel |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
