首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国司法鉴定质证程序的困境与出路
引用本文:赵长江.论我国司法鉴定质证程序的困境与出路[J].中国司法鉴定,2011(3):21-25.
作者姓名:赵长江
作者单位:重庆邮电大学,法学院,重庆,400065;西南政法大学,法学院,重庆,400031
摘    要:我国司法鉴定质证程序自《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》颁布后并没有显著改变,鉴定人不出庭和对鉴定意见质证流于形式的问题仍然存在。究其原因,从宏观上看是诉讼制度的问题,从微观上看是鉴定意见质证本身的缺陷。解决这一问题,在宏观上应当在诉讼程序中建立和完善证据开示制度、交叉询问制度;在微观上应建立异议和关键鉴定意见强制出庭制度,明确不出庭的后果,规范质证规则和内容,并建立专家辅助人制度。

关 键 词:司法鉴定  鉴定意见  质证

On the Problems and Solutions of the Cross-examination Procedure of Forensic Appraisal
ZHAO Chang-jiang.On the Problems and Solutions of the Cross-examination Procedure of Forensic Appraisal[J].Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences,2011(3):21-25.
Authors:ZHAO Chang-jiang
Institution:ZHAO Chang-jiang(1.Institute of Law,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065,China; 2.Institute of law,Southwest university Political Science,Chongqing 400031 China)
Abstract:No remarkable changes have taken place in cross-examination of forensic appraisal since the implementation of the "Decision on the Administration of Forensic Appraisal".The problems still remain where appraisers do not appear in court and the cross-examination is merely a formality.From a macroscopic view,it is a problem of the procedure system;from a microscopic view,it arises from the defects of the cross-examination system.To resolve these problems,the system of discovery and cross-examination should be built in the litigation procedure.The compulsory appearance with clear unfavorable consequences against challenged for key appraisal opinions,the rules of cross-examination,and the expert assistant system should also be established in law.
Keywords:forensic appraisal  appraisal opinion  cross-examination
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号