Lessons from a successful and failed random assignment testing batterer program innovations |
| |
Authors: | Edward W Gondolf |
| |
Institution: | (1) Mid-Atlantic Addiction Research and Training Institute, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA |
| |
Abstract: | With increasing pressure to conduct experimental evaluations of domestic violence interventions, it is important to weigh
further the most challenging aspect of experimental designs: the implementation of random assignment. This paper reviews two
attempted experimental evaluations of counseling programs for domestic violence offenders, and formulates implications for
conducting and interpreting program evaluations. The two case studies offer an instructive comparison of a maximally implemented
experiment and a failed one at the same setting. In the first study, the random assignment was introduced within the counseling
program and with implicit leverage of court sanctions for non-compliance to the assignment. In the second, random assignment
was disrupted by unforeseeable events and inter-agency breakdowns in the complex referral system. Interestingly, implementation
issues in both studies raised divergent interpretations from researchers and practitioners. They appear to imply a need for
more disclosure of implementation problems in experimental evaluations and for more caution about over interpreting the existing
experimental evaluations in the field. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|