概念与类型法律思维之比较

概念与类型都为法律规范适用对象标准的表达形式，基于两者的不同特性，则有两种不同的法律思维形式或法律适用方法。以概念表达的对象标准通常为事实构成要件。其强调确定性、安定性，但概念思维即通常所称的逻辑涵摄，在司法裁判中过分注重事实归类或形式正义，而忽视个案正义的价值关照。以类型表达的对象标准，着重树立某种中心价值，其适用范围具有开放性。相应地，类型思维则是一种价值导向性思维，其注重规范与事实的“意义”关联，关照个案正义。对于两种思维方式的比较研究，有重大的法学方法论意义。

The Compares Between the Juristical Thought of Concept and Type

The concept and the type are all expressive forms of criterion of object on law.Basing on different characteristic between them,there are two different forms of the thoughts on law or applicable forms on law.the criterion of object which is expressed by concept usually is called factual constitutional factors,and they are certain and stable.But the juristical thought of concept,that is usually called logistic inclusion,egregiously pays attention to factual classify or formal justice in the judicial judgment...