首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论全程同步录音录像代替笔录固定口供
引用本文:李玉鹏. 论全程同步录音录像代替笔录固定口供[J]. 证据科学, 2009, 17(5): 620-628
作者姓名:李玉鹏
作者单位:北京市通州区人民检察院
基金项目:北京市教委科学研究与科研基地建设项目"人民法院统一证据规定北京地区实证研究"的阶段性成果之一 
摘    要:录音录像资料与传统的文字笔录都属于犯罪嫌疑人的供述和辩解,系被告人的庭前陈述,但前者可以使庭前陈述具有证据可采性,在翻供的情况下还可以转化为证明讯问过程合法的视听资料。当前检察机关在讯问职务犯罪嫌疑人时对口供的记录方式,采取以笔录为主以录音录像资料为辅的并用模式.这种并用模式在实践中不仅造成了司法资源的浪费,也干扰了正常的讯问工作,应采用单独使用录音录像固定口供的模式。

关 键 词:全程同步录音录像  笔录  口供  证据可采性

Synchronous Audiu-Video Record for Fixing Cofessions
Li Yupeng. Synchronous Audiu-Video Record for Fixing Cofessions[J]. Evidence Science, 2009, 17(5): 620-628
Authors:Li Yupeng
Affiliation:Li Yupeng.( Touzhou District People's Procuratorate, Beijing)
Abstract:Audio-video records and conventional written records, concerning the confessions and defenses of crime suspects, are the defendant" s pretrial statements. The previous leads to admissibility of pretrial statements as evidence and can be used for proving legitimacy of the questioning process when the defendant retracts his or her confessions. Currently the procuratorate records the suspect" s confessions with writing as the major form and audio-video as accessory. Such a mode unavoidably leads to ineffective exploitation of judicial resources and creates obstruction to regular questioning of the suspects. This author believes that audio-video recording alone should be used for filing confessions.
Keywords:Synchronized Audio-video record   Written record   Confession   Admissibility of evidence
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号