| Abstract: | Although implementation of the federal Government Performanceand Results Act (GPRA) has provided the framework for the federalperformance effort, other efforts have been undertaken withinfederal agencies to balance the two often conflicting imperatives:to provide states with flexibility and yet maintain a commitmentto performance outcomes that acknowledges the expectations ofthose who fund and authorize programs. This analysis seeks todevelop a typology to examine the ways that the federal governmenthas attempted to bridge the goals of funders with the demandsof those who implement programs. This article highlights sixdifferent approaches that have been taken recently within federalagencies: performance partnerships, incentives, negotiated measures,building performance goals into legislation, establishment ofstandards, and waivers. |
