| 论刑法中的牵连关系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄俊平,曾粤兴. 论刑法中的牵连关系[J]. 河南公安高等专科学校学报, 2003, 0(3): 11-16 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄俊平 曾粤兴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院 中国北京100872(黄俊平)，中国人民大学法学院 中国北京100872(曾粤兴) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 牵连关系是一个客观的范畴。对于牵连关系的认定 ,折衷说不是合适的选择。牵连关系的判断是具体的个别的判断。方法与目的型牵连关系的判断标准是 :一行为与另一构成行为事实间有内在的质的一致性 ,且二者有服务与被服务的关系。原因结果型牵连关系的判断标准是 :两个行为之间有事实上的引起与被引起的关系。方法行为与结果行为可以是不具有独立构成的刑法意义上的危害行为
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法 牵连犯 牵连关系 |
On Implicative Relationship in Criminal Law |
| |
| HUANG Jun-ping,ZENG Yue-xing. On Implicative Relationship in Criminal Law[J]. Journal of Henan Public Security Academy, 2003, 0(3): 11-16 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Jun-ping ZENG Yue-xing |
| |
| Abstract: | Implicative relationship is an objective conception, and the theory of eclecticism is not scientific in implicative relationship judgment. It is a factual and individual judgment. The criteria in the type of method and purpose are the inside consistency between one behavior and another behavior fact, and also the relation of service and served. The criteria in the type of causes and results are that there is actual causal relationship between two behavior facts. The method and the result behavior in implicative relationship can unnecessarily be an independent offence behavior. |
| |
| Keywords: | Implicated offense Implicative relationship Purpose offence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
