首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

盗窃窨井盖行为定性之若干思考
引用本文:张亚平. 盗窃窨井盖行为定性之若干思考[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2006, 0(3): 33-36
作者姓名:张亚平
作者单位:河南大学,现代法制研究所,河南,开封,475001
摘    要:近些年来,盗窃窨井盖行为频频发生.对盗窃窨井盖行为按照以危险方法危害公共安全罪处理是适当的.这种认定不违背罪刑法定原则,因为罪刑法定原则已经从当年绝对的罪刑法定走到当今相对的罪刑法定;从构成要件的角度来看,盗窃窨井盖行为也符合以危险方法危害公共安全罪的构成;这种认定也不是重刑主义,而是罪刑均衡.对这种行为的认定不需要寻求最高人民法院的司法解释.

关 键 词:盗窃窨井盖  以危险方法危害公共安全罪  罪刑法定原则  重刑主义
文章编号:1008-7966(2006)03-0033-04
修稿时间:2006-02-18

Reflections about the Determination of the Behavior of Stealing Well - covers
ZHANG Ya-ping. Reflections about the Determination of the Behavior of Stealing Well - covers[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2006, 0(3): 33-36
Authors:ZHANG Ya-ping
Affiliation:ZHANG Ya-ping
Abstract:In recent years,the well-covers are stolen frequently.It's appropriate to determinate this behavior as the crime of endangering public security with dangerous method.This determination does not deviate the statutory principle of crime and punishment because this principle has evolved to relativity from absolute;this behavior coincide with the constitution of the crime of endangering public security with dangerous method and this determination is not the idea of heavy penalty but appropriate punishment for the crime.
Keywords:steal well-covers  endanger public security with dangerous method  the statutory principle of crime and punishment  the idea of heavy penalty  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号