| 培根“四假相”说的诠释学意蕴 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔若椈,崔永杰.培根“四假相”说的诠释学意蕴[J].理论学刊,2012(2):65-71,128. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔若椈 崔永杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872;山东师范大学政治与国际关系学院,山东济南250014 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山东省社科规划项目“西方主体性问题的历史嬗变及内在逻辑研究”(项目编号:05BZZ04)的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “假相说”是培根哲学体系中最重要、最有影响的学说之一.该学说的重要理论价值关键不在于它包含有对经院哲学的批判,而在于它从认识主体即解释者的角度探讨了认识或解释自然过程中产生谬误的原因,在于它通过对阻碍“自然的解释”种种因素的精彩分析深刻阐述了偏见与理解、解释之间的关系,从而以特有的方式揭示了“理解的历史性”等问题.内涵于培根“假相说”中的诠释学思想,深刻地影响了近代以来诠释学的产生与发展.
|
| 关 键 词： | 四假相 偏见 理解与解释 诠释学 |
On Hermeneutic Implications in Bacon’s Four Idols |
| |
| Cui Ruoju & Cui Yongjie.On Hermeneutic Implications in Bacon’s Four Idols[J].Theory Journal,2012(2):65-71,128. |
| |
| Authors: | Cui Ruoju & Cui Yongjie |
| |
| Institution: | Cui Ruoju & Cui Yongjie(Faculty of Philosophy of Remin University of China,Beijing 100872;Politics and International Relations School of Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong 250014) |
| |
| Abstract: | Idol theory is one of the most important and influential doctrines of Bacon’s philosophical system.The vital theoretical value lies in its exploration of the causes of the fallacies in the process of understanding or interpreting nature,from the perspective of the subjects or interpreters,rather than its criticism on scholasticism.It lies in giving an analysis of the factors hindering the natural interpretation and profoundly expounding the relationship between prejudice and comprehension or interpretation,thus revealing the historicity of understanding in a unique way.The theory of hermeneutics implied in Bacon’s Idols has produced profound influences on the emergence and development of hermeneutics in the modern times. |
| |
| Keywords: | four idols bias understanding and interpretation hermeneutics |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
