由“濠梁之辩”看庄子的世界观

本文通过《庄子.秋水》中庄子和惠子在濠梁之上的辩论对庄子的世界观做探讨。庄子的逻辑是"万物一体"在"道"的层面上相通为一,现实中的"物化"并不妨碍这样的相通。而惠子是否认这样的说法的,他们的逻辑出发点是不一样的,这场看似激烈的辩论实际上并没有产生对话,而是在自说自话。辩论远没有结束,然而庄子的世界观已经展现无遗。于是,濠梁之上的辩论也就结束了。庄子在"濠梁之上"知鱼乐,在世界之中观世界,其思想是一贯的。在现实生活中做真人,读《庄子》,很有意义。

By the "Ho Leung Debate" See Zhuangzi's View of the World

This paper gives a explortion about Zhuangzi＇s view of the world through a debate between Zhuangzi and Keiko in the Ho beam above. Zhuangzi＇s logic is ＂all things are one,＂ in the level of ＂Dao＂ all things are similarities. The reality in the ＂ materialization＂ does not preclude such an interlinked. But Keiko gives a negation of that argument, and their logical starting point is not the same. This looks like an intense debate, but in fact did not produce a dialogue, they are only talking to themselves. The debate is far from over, but the Zhuangzi＇s view of the world has demonstrated beyond doubt. As a result, the ＂Ho Leung Debate＂ will be over. Chuang-tzu in the ＂Ho Leung on＂ know fish are happy, in the world of concept, the idea is consistent. As real person in real life, reading ＂Zhuangzi＂ is very meaningful for us.