| 论功能性限定权利要求的解释 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵振民.论功能性限定权利要求的解释[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2010(3):60-63. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵振民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国的立法和司法实践,对功能性限定权利要求存在两种不同的解释方法,给专利实务和司法实践带来了诸多难题。对功能性限定权利要求应该采用相同标准的解释方法,即采用具体加等同的解释方法,增加和完善相关规定,为解释方法的统一提供法律依据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 功能性限定权利要求 所有方式的解释方法 具体加等同的解释 方法 |
Interpretation of Means-Plus-Function Claims |
| |
| Zhao Zhenmin.Interpretation of Means-Plus-Function Claims[J].bejing college of political science and law journal,2010(3):60-63. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhao Zhenmin |
| |
| Institution: | Zhao Zhenmin |
| |
| Abstract: | There exist two interpreting approaches concerning means-plus-function claims in our legislative and judicial practices. The two different approaches have caused numbers of difficult issues in our patent affairs and judicial practice. The author holds that the interpreting approach should be consistent, that is, we should adopt the specific-plus-equivalent interpreting approach in all cases. Legal basis should be provided for the consistency with addition and improvement of relevant stipulations. |
| |
| Keywords: | means-plus-function claims all-form interpreting approach specific-plus- equivalent interpreting approach |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
