论具体的方法错误的归责

对于具体的方法错误的归责，刑法理论上主要存在具体符合说和法定符合说的对立。犯罪构成计划理论对于方法错误的处理，更倾向于具体符合说的观点。具体符合说的归责理论的缺陷，就在于其忽略了行为所违反的法规范及其保护目的在故意和过失的认定以及结果责任归属判断上的决定性评价意义。反之，法定符合说从规范的角度把握了问题的实质。具体符合说认为具体的方法错误在通常情况下成立想象竞合，这不仅不利于保护刑法法益，也无助于实现刑法公正。

On the Liability Fixation of Concrete Strike Mistake

There are disagreements between doctrines of concrete accord and doctrines of legally prescribed accord in criminal theories on liability fixation of concrete strike mistake. The theory of plan of criminal constitution is inclined to the opinions of doctrines of concrete accord. The deficiencies of the doctrines of concrete accord lie in its neglecting the laws,which is breached by the behavior,and the values of the law＇s safeguarding objectives. Otherwise, doctrines of legally prescribed accord hit it big. Doctrines of concrete accord hold that the concrete strike mistake shall be treated as the imaginative joinder of offenses, which is neither good in safeguarding the criminal law interest, nor beneficial to achieving the criminal law justness.