首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论自由心证的“自由”与“不自由”
引用本文:魏凤娟. 论自由心证的“自由”与“不自由”[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2009, 11(6): 16-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2009.06.02
作者姓名:魏凤娟
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100088
摘    要:自由心证制度是在反对法定证据制度的基础上发展而来的,它符合人类认识活动的客观规律,较好地协调了认识现实世界的复杂多样性和最大限度发现案件真实的目的之间的关系,使得法官拥有判断证据证明力的自由获得了正当性和合理性。但同时由于人性的弱点以及非理性因素的影响,法官的心证自由又存在着被滥用的危险,需要通过种种限制性措施对其加以规制。

关 键 词:自由心证  自由  规制

Freedom and Regulations of Discretional Evaluation
WEI Feng-juan. Freedom and Regulations of Discretional Evaluation[J]. Journal of Swupl, 2009, 11(6): 16-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2009.06.02
Authors:WEI Feng-juan
Affiliation:WEI Feng-juan (China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China)
Abstract:The discretional evaluation of evidence develops from the foundation that against the statutory evidence. It reflects the objective rules of human cognition activities, and coordinates the relation between the complexity and diversity of actually world and the aim of finding facts at the utmost. As a result, the judge' s freedom of evaluating the evidential probative force obtains validity and rationality. But at the same time, because of the frailties of human nature and the influence of irrational factors, judge' s discretional evaluation might be abused. So we need variety of measures to regulate it. When we perfect our country~ evidential provi- sions, "freedom" and "regulations" of discretional evaluation should be bounded the in a reasonable scope. Just as the saying goes, "do as one wishes, and don' t transgress what is right. "
Keywords:discretional evaluation  freedom  regulations
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号