| 香港与大陆刑法中的胁迫之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭辅顺. 香港与大陆刑法中的胁迫之比较[J]. 湖南公安高等专科学校学报, 2002, 14(3): 52-54 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭辅顺 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学,湖南,长沙,410083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 胁迫在香港刑法中既是某些罪的犯罪手段 ,更是刑事被告人的一种合法的辨护理由。在大陆刑法中 ,胁迫主要是作为某些罪的犯罪手段而加以规定 ,但参加犯罪若被胁迫也可导致刑事责任的减轻。比较香港大陆两地刑法中的胁迫 ,可见二者在胁迫的方式、对象、程度、紧迫性及法律后果等方面均存异同之处 ;且香港刑法中有关胁迫影响刑事责任的规范比大陆刑法中胁从犯的规定更显合理 ,可为大陆刑法所借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 胁迫 犯罪手段 刑事责任 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7575(2002)03-0052-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-03-04 |
Comparison of Coercion between Criminal Law ofHong Kong and Criminal Law of Mainland in China |
| |
| PENG Fu-shun. Comparison of Coercion between Criminal Law ofHong Kong and Criminal Law of Mainland in China[J]. Journal of Huan Public Security College, 2002, 14(3): 52-54 |
| |
| Authors: | PENG Fu-shun |
| |
| Abstract: | Coercion is not only a means of some crimes,but also a lawful defending reason of criminal defendants in Criminal Law of Hong Kong.The coercion is primarily stipulated as means of some crimes in Criminal Law of mainland in China,but a criminal's liability may decrease if he is coerced to participate a crime.By comparison of the coercion between Criminal Law of Hong Kong and Criminal Law of mainland in China,it can be realized that the coercion in both laws has same and different points about style,target,degree,urgency and legal consequences,and the legal norm which influences criminal liability in Criminal Law of Hong Kong is more reasonable than that in Criminal Law of mainland in China.Accordingly it may be borrowed to Criminal Law of mainland in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | coercion means of crime criminal liability comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
