| 刑事和解借鉴之分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄京平,左袖阳. 刑事和解借鉴之分析[J]. 当代法学, 2008, 0(1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄京平 左袖阳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院;中国人民大学法学院 北京; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事和解是一种新型的刑事司法关系。我国借鉴刑事和解制度的依据在于刑事和解可以更好地解决特定类型刑事案件中行为人的责任。借鉴刑事和解制度并不会弱化预防功能,也不违背法律面前人人平等的原则。目前借鉴刑事和解制度有利因素与不利因素并存,但不利因素并非刑事和解自身的弊端。应该以既积极又谨慎的态度看待刑事和解借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事和解 行为人责任 可行性 |
Analyses on the Adoption of VOR |
| |
| HUANG Jing-ping,ZUO Xiu-yang. Analyses on the Adoption of VOR[J]. Contemporary Law Review, 2008, 0(1) |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Jing-ping ZUO Xiu-yang |
| |
| Affiliation: | HUANG Jing-ping,ZUO Xiu-yang(Law school,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872) |
| |
| Abstract: | The relationship exists in VOR is a new kind of criminal relationship. The basis for adopting VOR is that it can solve the issue of criminal responsibility of special criminal case better than traditional ways. The adoption of VOR will not weaken the function of prevention, nor will it break the principle of equality before law. The advantages and disadvantages co-exist in the adoption of VOR. However, these disadvantages are not inherent with VOR. Positive and prudent attitude shall be administered to the ... |
| |
| Keywords: | VOR criminal responsibility feasibility |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
