From Sancitity to Screening: Genetic Disabilities, Risk and Rhetorical Strategies in Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception Cases |
| |
Authors: | Robin Mackenzie |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Kent Law School, Eliot College, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NS, UK, E-mail |
| |
Abstract: | This analysis scrutinises the rhetorical strategies used by judges in wrongful life and wrongful birth actions as evidence for the assertion that the judicial reading of public policy in such cases has undergone a significant shift which is likely to accelerate as genetic knowledge grows and health care resources shrink. The implications of the predicted move towards increased genetic testing of prospective parents are traversed in relation to feminist analyses of the impact of genetics on reproductive technology. These are viewed as forming a nexus with the current social constructions of disability and the contemporary cultural preoccupation with risk, in a context of the increasing commercial importance of genetic information. It is argued that women cannot make free and informed choices about genetic testing and pregnancy unless legal and social mechanisms which protect those choices are in place. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. |
| |
Keywords: | abortion disability feminism genetic testing genetics rhetorical strategies reproduction risk wrongful birth wrongful life |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|