首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

抢夺罪最新司法解释的实践检讨
引用本文:陈晨. 抢夺罪最新司法解释的实践检讨[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2014, 0(6): 32-35
作者姓名:陈晨
作者单位:黑龙江大学法学院,哈尔滨,150080
摘    要:抢夺罪是最常见的侵害财产罪名之一,学术界与司法实践中对其犯罪构成等基础理论并未有太大分歧。2013年最高人民法院和最高人民检察院对抢夺罪的最新司法解释增加了孕妇、病人等特殊保护对象,保留了数额较大等定罪标准但提高了定罪量刑的数额,并增加了导致他人自杀这一严重情节,引入了被害人谅解制度。最新的司法解释不仅未能全部明确解释现存问题,反而在司法实践中导致新问题的出现。

关 键 词:抢夺罪  司法解释  司法实践

Review the Latest Judicial Interpretation Practice aboutthe Crime of Plunder
YANG Chen. Review the Latest Judicial Interpretation Practice aboutthe Crime of Plunder[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2014, 0(6): 32-35
Authors:YANG Chen
Abstract:The crime of plunder is one of the most common charges to infringe property. There are no big differences between judicature and academia field on the basic theory such as crime constitution. In November 18th, 2013, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate announced the latest judiciary interpretation, which has brought a series of issues on judicature. The new crime of plunder adds some special protected objects like"the pregnant"and"the sick". The judicial proving standard such as"large amount" is reserved, but it raises the amount of penalty measurement. In addition, this new interpretation adds a serious circumstances-- "Because the crime of seizing caused Dutch act"brings in"The Victim's forgiving system". The latest judicial explan ation is not able to make all the issues clear and definite, and brings new problems as well.
Keywords:the crime of plunder  the interpretation of law  juridical practice
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号