| 虚假广告致害与侵权行为致害的异同——兼论法律对信赖利益的保护 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪春霖.虚假广告致害与侵权行为致害的异同——兼论法律对信赖利益的保护[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2014(6):64-67. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪春霖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学,上海,200333 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 广告业的发展参差不齐,虚假广告尤为明显,由虚假广告致害的个体逐渐增多。此类问题的解决需要首先从虚假广告致害与侵权行为致害的不同入手分析,再分析虚假广告的严重性,然后提出虚假广告所侵犯的是消费者的信赖利益及信赖利益的保护。
|
| 关 键 词： | 虚假广告 信赖利益 咨询业 |
The Difference between False Advertising Virulence and Tort Virulence——Also on the Legal protection of the reliance interest |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Chun-lin |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Chun-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | With the uneven development of the advertising industry and false advertising, individuals injured by false advertising are gradually increasing. This paper will begin with the differences between false advertising virulence and tort virulence and analyze the seriousness of false advertising and presents false advertising violated the protection of consumers reliance interest. |
| |
| Keywords: | false advertising reliance interest consulting |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
