首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

人工智能算法安全犯罪观及其规范刑法学展开
引用本文:魏东. 人工智能算法安全犯罪观及其规范刑法学展开[J]. 政法论丛, 2020, 0(3): 107-120
作者姓名:魏东
作者单位:四川大学法学院
基金项目:国家重点研发计划“高质高效的审判支撑关键技术及装备研究”(2018YFC0830300)的阶段性成果。
摘    要:人工智能犯罪的实质内涵是人工智能算法安全犯罪,其保护法益是作为公共安全的人工智能"算法安全"。人工智能算法安全犯罪的规范刑法学研究应当采取贯通当下视角和将来视角的第三种视角,努力实现"算法安全犯罪"规范一体的立法论建构和解释论建构的融合,将人工智能犯罪的保护法益类型化、犯罪行为类型化、归责类型化研究作为重要学术使命,推动人工智能犯罪领域的刑法立法完善和规范刑法学理论创新。

关 键 词:人工智能犯罪观  算法安全  规范刑法学  立法论  解释论

A Study on the Perception of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Security Crime and an Extension of the Corresponding Normative Criminal Jurisprudence
Wei Dong. A Study on the Perception of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Security Crime and an Extension of the Corresponding Normative Criminal Jurisprudence[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2020, 0(3): 107-120
Authors:Wei Dong
Affiliation:(Law School of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610225)
Abstract:The essence of artificial intelligence(AI) crime is AI algorithm security crime. Meanwhile, the legal interest of AI crime is public safety, which is known as AI "algorithm security". The research on normative criminal jurisprudence of AI algorithm security crime should adopt a third perspective that interconnects both current and future perspectives, which strive to achieve the normative integration of the legislative and hermeneutic construction of "algorithm security crime". The typification of legal interests, criminal behavior and attribution on AI crime is an important academic cause, which promotes the legislative improvement of criminal law in the field of AI and the innovation on theories of normative criminal jurisprudence.
Keywords:the perception of AI crime  security of algorithm  normative criminal jurisprudence  legislative science  hermeneutics
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号