首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论公证的证据效力
引用本文:潘洁. 论公证的证据效力[J]. 湖南公安高等专科学校学报, 2005, 17(4): 91-93
作者姓名:潘洁
作者单位:华东政法学院,上海,200042
摘    要:证据效力是公证的基本效力之一,也被视为公证与私证的主要区别。公证的证据效力包括两方面内容:一是公证证明的内容属于司法认知的范畴;二是从证据材料的优先性来看,经过公证的书证证明力大于一般的书证。公证的公信力是公证证据效力的渊源,而相关法律规定也为这种公信力提供了保障。公证证据在诉讼证明中可以成为书证,经过公证的法律行为、法律事实和文书属于可予认知的内容,只是在形式上具有初步可信的证明效力,因而在某种程度上是可辩驳和推翻的。目前,公证证据在我国仅适用于民事诉讼,在刑事诉讼中的运用应受到限制,一般不宜成为司法认知的对象、不能直接作为定罪量刑的依据。

关 键 词:公证  证据效力  公信力  诉讼证明
文章编号:1008-7575(2005)04-0091-03
修稿时间:2005-05-08

On Evidence Effect of Notarization
PAN Jie. On Evidence Effect of Notarization[J]. Journal of Huan Public Security College, 2005, 17(4): 91-93
Authors:PAN Jie
Abstract:The evidence effect is the basic effect of notarization and considered as the main difference between notarization and private card too. The evidence effect of notarization includes two respects content, first, the content of the certification by a notary belongs to the category with cognitive administration of justice; second, the notarization effect of proving documented evidence is greater than the general documented evidence from evidence material preferment. The public trust of notarization is the origin of the effect, and relevant legal provisions has provided safeguard to this kind of public trust. Notarization evidence in lawsuit can become documented evidence, belong to and can give the cognitive content juristic act, juristic fact, notarization document, just have a preliminary believable identification effect in form, therefore it can be dispute and overt rowed to a certain extent. At present, it is only suitable for the civil action in our country, the application in criminal suit should be limited, it is generally unsuitable to become the target with cognitive administration of justice, and it can't be regarded as the bases which declare the measurement of penalty guilty directly.
Keywords:notarization  evidence effect  public trust  lawsuit proving  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号