| 保险诈骗罪第4款解释路径的法律分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹玉玉. 保险诈骗罪第4款解释路径的法律分析[J]. 山西警官高等专科学校学报, 2013, 21(1): 26-29 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹玉玉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海,200062 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 片面共犯由于违背共同故意要件因而不属于共同犯罪,其不能对保险诈骗罪第4款的法律性质作出合理的解释。保险诈骗罪第4款既不属于法律拟制和注意规定,也不属于想象竞合和法规竞合,其是法律文本主义的当然解释,亦是大竞合理论下,适用从一重处断原则的当然结果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 保险诈骗罪第4款 解释路径 片面共犯 法律文本主义 大竞合论 |
Legal Analysis on the Interpretative Route in Paragraph 4 of Crime of Insurance Fraud |
| |
| CAO Yu-yu. Legal Analysis on the Interpretative Route in Paragraph 4 of Crime of Insurance Fraud[J]. Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy, 2013, 21(1): 26-29 |
| |
| Authors: | CAO Yu-yu |
| |
| Affiliation: | CAO Yu-yu(School of Graduate and Education,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200062,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The one-sided accomplice violates the elements of common intention.So it is not the joint crime,which does not give unreasonable interpretations about the legal nature of paragraph 4 in crime of insurance fraud.Paragraph 4 in crime of insurance fraud is neither legal fiction or provision of attention nor the imaginative coincidence and legislative coincidence,which is the natural interpretation of legal text and the natural outcome of applying the principle of severe punishment under the theory of large coincidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | paragraph 4 in crime of insurance fraud interpretation route the one-sided accomplice the doctrine of legal text the theory of large coincidence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
