| 边界的空隙:一个历史人类学的场域 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭兆荣. 边界的空隙:一个历史人类学的场域[J]. 思想战线, 2004, 30(1): 101-106 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭兆荣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学,人类学研究所,福建,厦门,361005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 历史学与人类学的成功整合体现出学术反思在学科之间进行对话的一种自觉。所以,历史人类学并非学科生存策略上的需求性产物,而是知识与叙事上的优势互补。随着人类学自身的历史发展以及学理依据、学科内容、学术规范的不断演变,使它不仅具有知识的整合特点,而且兼有反思的特性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 历史人类学 想象的共同体 制造 历史现场 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-778X(2004)01-0101-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-11-12 |
A Marginal Gap:The Field of Historical Anthropology |
| |
| PENG Zhao-rong. A Marginal Gap:The Field of Historical Anthropology[J]. The Ideological Front(Yunnan University's Journal of Social Sciences), 2004, 30(1): 101-106 |
| |
| Authors: | PENG Zhao-rong |
| |
| Abstract: | The successful integration of history with anthropology reflects the positive interactivities between or among academic disciplines. The emergence of historical anthropology is in fact the reasonable complement in knowledge and narration rather than a choice for disciplinary survival. With its progress as well as the improvement in theories, contents and norms development of anthropology, anthropology will take on important features of academic integration and reflection. |
| |
| Keywords: | historical anthropology commonality of imagination creation historical site |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
