首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

强制性行业协会成员管理权的性质定位——以公法与私法的关系为视角
引用本文:余韬. 强制性行业协会成员管理权的性质定位——以公法与私法的关系为视角[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2009, 24(1): 26-30,47
作者姓名:余韬
作者单位:华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海,200042
摘    要:在我国,一部分行业协会由于法律规定了潜在成员的强制加入而成为强制性行业协会。在公法与私法划分理论的框架之下,此类行业协会所享有的成员管理权在现有法律规定中并没有与一般社团组织权力作出区分,而是被笼统定位于私法权力,并因此在实践中面临困境。实际上,在对强制性行业协会成员管理权的性质定位的路径中,存在着公法权力与私法权力的双向展开的可能,并在实质-形式的关联中实现公法属性与私法属性的融合。

关 键 词:强制性行业协会  管理权  公法权力  私法权力

The Nature of Compulsory Industry Association''s Management Authority to Members
YU Tao. The Nature of Compulsory Industry Association''s Management Authority to Members[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2009, 24(1): 26-30,47
Authors:YU Tao
Affiliation:East China University of Political Science and Law;shanghai;200042
Abstract:In our country,a part of the industry associations become to compulsory ones because the law rules potential member's obligation of joining.Under the framework of the theory that the division of public and private law,management authority enjoyed by compulsory industry associations haven't been discriminated from common social organizations'authority by existing legislation,which is generally located in the private law authority.This situation has led to difficulties in practice.In fact,the path of the loca...
Keywords:compulsory industry association  management authority  public law authority  private law authority  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号