| 20世纪中国哲学史研究模式析论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周德丰,陆信礼.20世纪中国哲学史研究模式析论[J].天津市工会管理干部学院学报,2004,12(4):61-63. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周德丰 陆信礼 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南开大学,天津市,300073 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪的中国哲学史研究,大致存在三种模式,即:本土化的研究模式;西方化的研究模式;中西结合的研究模式。相比较而言,最后一种研究模式最为合理,而前两种研究模式皆存在一定的弊端。我们应继续坚持中西结合的研究模式,将中国哲学史研究继续推向深入。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国哲学史 研究模式 本土化 西方化 中西结合 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8636(2004)04-0061-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年5月3日 |
The analyses and discussion on the research mode of the Chinese philosophical history in the 20th Century |
| |
| ZHOU Defeng,Lu Xinli.The analyses and discussion on the research mode of the Chinese philosophical history in the 20th Century[J].Journal of Tianjin Trade Union Administrators‘ College,2004,12(4):61-63. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Defeng Lu Xinli |
| |
| Institution: | Nankai University Tianjin 300073 |
| |
| Abstract: | The research on the Chinese philosophical history in the 20th century, approximately, it is divided into three kinds of modes, namely: the nationalized research mode; the Western research mode and the Chinese and Western combination research mode. Comparatively speaking, the last research mode is the most reasonable one, and the previous two kinds of research modes have some disadvantages. We should persist in the research mode combining the Chinese and Western continuously, and we should push the research on the Chinese philosophical history forward in depth. |
| |
| Keywords: | Chinese Philosophical History Research Mode Nationalization Westernization Combination between the Chinese and Western |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
