对诱惑侦查所得证据材料的法理分析

诱惑侦查作为一种特殊侦查手段,在侦破一些具有隐蔽性和组织性的重大刑事案件时具有特殊效果。但在我国,不论是从刑事实体法,还是从刑事程序法的角度来看,诱惑侦查都存在与现行法律的严重冲突。那么对诱惑侦查所得证据材料又当如何采信,通过对诱惑侦查所得证据材料进行法理分析,可以认为从我国司法实际出发,在采证诱惑侦查所取的证据材料时,应明确对非法言词证据予以排除,对非法实物证据予以限制性肯定;同时尽快将诱惑侦查纳入法治化轨道,对诱惑侦查进行法律规制。

A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Evidential Materials Obtained by Trapped Investigation

The trapped investigation, as a special investigative measure, can bring about unique effects in the investigation of some concealed and organized criminal cases. However, in China, the trapped investigation has serious conflicts with both the current substantial and procedural law. By making a jurisprudential analysis of the evidential materials obtained by trapped investigation, this paper points out that, with regard to the admissibility of evidences obtained by trapped investigation, we should base on our present judicial practice, clearly define that the illegal oral evidences shall be excluded and the illegal object evidences shall be admitted restrictively. Meanwhile, we should strengthen the legalization construction of the trapped investigation and make relevant regulations on it.