| 诉讼诈骗的刑法分析——质疑最高人民检察院的一个《答复》 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郑薇,吴巍.诉讼诈骗的刑法分析——质疑最高人民检察院的一个《答复》[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2005,19(2):60-63. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郑薇 吴巍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 郑薇（华东政法学院,上海,200042）;吴巍（华东政法学院,上海,200042） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 诈骗罪包括两者之间的诈骗和三角诈骗。诉讼诈骗符合诈骗罪的客观构成要件,是三角诈骗的典型形式。最高人民检察院《关于通过伪造证据骗取法院民事裁判占有他人财物的行为如何适用法律问题的答复》既不符合刑法理论,也不利于司法实践。
|
| 关 键 词： | 三角诈骗 诉讼诈骗 交付行为 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6048(2005)02-0060-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年11月29 |
A Brief Analysis on Swindle in Legal Proceedings in Criminal Law--Challenging a Reply from the People's Supreme Procuratorate |
| |
| Zheng Wei,Wu Wei.A Brief Analysis on Swindle in Legal Proceedings in Criminal Law--Challenging a Reply from the People's Supreme Procuratorate[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2005,19(2):60-63. |
| |
| Authors: | Zheng Wei Wu Wei |
| |
| Abstract: | The crime of swindle includes two types: one occurs between two individuals and the other in triangle form. Swindle in legal proceedings conforms to the objective constitutional elements of a general swindle crime, and it is a typical pattern of triangle fraud. "A Reply Regarding Issues of Law Application to Conduct Possessing Others' Property through Unlawfully Obtaining the Favorable Civil Judgment by Using Falsified Evidences", issued by the People's Supreme Procuratorate in China, is neither in compliance with theory of criminal law, nor beneficial to judicial practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | triangle swindle swindle in legal proceedings act of delivery |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
