首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

用学理解释作判决依据违反法治原则——从一起简单民事案件的复杂诉讼历程谈起
引用本文:马进保. 用学理解释作判决依据违反法治原则——从一起简单民事案件的复杂诉讼历程谈起[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2004, 0(3): 68-72
作者姓名:马进保
作者单位:广东法商大学法学院,广东,广州,510320
摘    要:法院以司法改革为名 ,把法官的学理解释作为裁判依据 ,违背了我国“以事实为依据 ,以法律为准绳”的司法原则。个别法院用独立司法权来抵制人大、人民检察院的监督权违背宪法精神。司法改革必须有序进行 ,在理顺审判机制的同时强化对独立审判权的监督 ,包括对失职法官的过错责任追究。无此便不能确保司法公正和效率目标的实现。

关 键 词:司法改革  自由裁量权  司法独立  执法过错追究

On Theoretical Explanation as Basis of Court Decision
Ma Jinbao. On Theoretical Explanation as Basis of Court Decision[J]. Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute, 2004, 0(3): 68-72
Authors:Ma Jinbao
Abstract:In the name of reform,the courts take judges' theoretical explanations as basis of court decisions. It goes against China's judicatory principles. Few courts reject the supervision of People's Congress and People's Procuratorate by using of independent jurisdiction. It goes counter to constitutional spirits. The judicatory reform must be carried on. While putting judicatory system in order,the supervision to independent jurisdiction must be strengthened. Otherwise,judicatory impartiality and efficiency can not be ensured.
Keywords:judicatory reform  free jurisdiction  judicatory independency  investigation of offence of enforcing the law  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号