| 我国物权变动立法应否采有因的物权行为模式 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘耀东.我国物权变动立法应否采有因的物权行为模式[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2010(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘耀东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连水产学院,经济管理学院,辽宁,大连,116023 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 有因的物权行为模式就是在承认物权行为理论的前提下,否认其无因性而改采有因性,其虽具一定的合理性且避免了无因性所产生的弊端,但有因物权行为同样是站在德国物权行为理论的土壤之上,对交付等事实行为的理论抽象。善意取得制度与公示公信原则不是可以相互替代的关系,善意取得制度是以公示公信原则为前提和基础。
|
| 关 键 词： | 物权行为 债权行为 物权行为无因性 |
Whether China's Legislation on Proprietary Right Alteration Shall Adopt the Causative Juristic Act of Real Right Mode |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Yao-dong |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Yao-dong |
| |
| Abstract: | The causative juristic act of real right mode denies the Abstract nature and adopts the causative nature on the premise of recognizing the theory on juristic act of right in rem.It has certain justification and avoids drawbacks that the Abstract nature caused.Nevertheless,causative juristic act of real right which originated from the Germany theory on juristic act of right in rem is also theoretically Abstract to factual behavior such as delivery.What's more,the relationship between the system of acquisitio... |
| |
| Keywords: | juristic acts of real right juristic acts of creditor's right principle of none cause proprietary right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
