如何应对传统定罪思维的困境——我国犯罪成立理论体系完善的核心问题

我国传统的平面化犯罪成立理论体系与司法三段论的定罪思维模式之间具有内在的契合性,铸就了我国传统犯罪成立理论的“解释性功能倾向”。但定罪过程的实质性特点使司法三段论面临困境,于是辩证推理的定罪思路成为解决问题的首选途径,此种思维模式为实质性因素的介入留下了余地。与此相适应,犯罪成立理论的核心问题就应当从解释法条转向限制实质性定罪知识起作用的方式和实现超法规定罪知识的具体化。在此前提下,“形式与实质的立体融合”就成为犯罪成立理论体系的应然建构思路。

On the Perfection of Chinese Criminal Constitution Theory

The traditional system of criminal constitution theory of our country corresponds to the judicial syllogism for conviction, this characteristic makes it become a system with elucidative function. But the judicial syllogism is confronted with a predicament of substantiality of the course of conviction. So the dialectic discursion for conviction becomes the preferred approach to solve problems and this approach makes the virtual factors into the criminating course. Accordingly, the core of the criminal constitute theory should turn to make the effect of virtual factors rationalization and make the virtual factors concretion. On this premises, the cascading criminal constitute theory becomes the best choice.