临时起意图财行为之定性——一起强奸抢劫案背后的法理探析

行为人基于其它犯罪目的,实施了暴力、胁迫行为,然后产生了取得被害人财物的故意并取得财物,此种行为如何定性？学界对此认识不一,司法实践中也存在较大争议。如果先行行为所产生的被害人意志被压制的状态与后续的图财行为之间存在因果牵连关系,宜认定为抢劫罪,反之,则宜认定为盗窃罪。具体说来,在作为前一犯罪行为手段的暴力、胁迫行为使被害人处于不敢反抗或没有反抗能力的状态下,产生取财意图,并取得被害人财物的,应认定为抢劫罪;在作为前一犯罪行为手段的暴力、胁迫行为使被害人处于不知反抗或死亡的状态下,产生取财意图,并取得被害人财物的,应认定为盗窃罪。

On Nature of Behavior of Abrupt Intention for Property

It is controversial in the field of criminal jurisprudence and judicial practice on how to definite the behavior nature that the actor for the harboring of other criminal intent,commits violence or coercion,then,has the intention for vic-tim's property and obtains it.If there exists causal relation between the suppressed condition of the victim's will which is caused by forgoing criminal behavior and following behavior for property,it is appropriate to be regarded as robbery.In-stead,it should be regarded as larceny.In specific,if the forgoing act of violence or coercion puts the victim under the con-ditions of not to dare or be unable to resist,the following behavior should be regarded as robbery;if the forgoing act of vi-olence or coercion puts the victim under the conditions of be unaware or dead,the following behavior should be regarded as larceny.