首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

以理财形式受贿司法认定疑难问题
引用本文:朱兴旺,章晓耿. 以理财形式受贿司法认定疑难问题[J]. 湖南公安高等专科学校学报, 2009, 21(3): 19-22
作者姓名:朱兴旺  章晓耿
作者单位:上海市闸北区人民检察院,上海,200070
摘    要:司法机关应当在全面理解最新受贿罪司法解释的基础上作出受贿犯罪的定性判断与数额计算,不能直接排除国家工作人员实际出资获取收益未明显超过应得收益行为的受贿性质。通过对利润真实性质的考察与例外情况排除受贿故意,能够从正反双重层面准确把握“明显高于应得收益”的司法认定。不能将接受具有高度风险性的证券、期货等收益机会认定为受贿。

关 键 词:委托理财  受贿  明显  收益机会  犯罪数额

Puzzling Issues in Defining Accepting Bribes Through Mandated Financing
ZHU Xing-wang,ZHANG Xiao-geng. Puzzling Issues in Defining Accepting Bribes Through Mandated Financing[J]. Journal of Huan Public Security College, 2009, 21(3): 19-22
Authors:ZHU Xing-wang  ZHANG Xiao-geng
Affiliation:People's Procuratorates of Zhabei District;Shanghai;200070;China
Abstract:Judicial authority should judge the crime of accepting bribes based on the overall understanding of the latest judicial interpretation of bribery crime,not directly excluding that the state functionary obtaining required rate of return from actual investment.Excluding intention of accepting bribes by inspecting the real nature of profits and exceptional cases can help to accurately comprehend the judicial recognition of "obvious higher than required rate of return".Accepting the revenue opportunities of sec...
Keywords:mandated financing  accept bribes  obvious  revenue opportunity  criminal amount  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号