What Would Mary Douglas Do? A Commentary on Kahan et al., “Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws” |
| |
Authors: | Jeffrey Swanson |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Involuntary outpatient commitment is a highly controversial issue in mental health law. Strong supporters of outpatient commitment
see it as a form of access to community-based mental health care and a less restrictive alternative to hospitalization for
people with severe mental illness; vocal opponents see it as an instrument of social control and an unwarranted deprivation
of individual liberty. Kahan and colleagues apply the theory of “cultural cognition” in an empirical study of how cultural
worldviews influence support for outpatient commitment laws among the general public and shape perceptions of evidence for
these laws’ effectiveness. This article critiques Kahan et al. and offers an alternative perspective on the controversy, emphasizing
particular social facts underlying stakeholders’ positions on outpatient commitment laws. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|