论民事权利、义务和责任的关系

侵权行为法在民法典中居于何种地位?传统民法理论对此尚无法做出满意回答。若将民事权利、义务和责任视为属于同一个位阶,三位一体统一于民事法律关系之中的概念,而视人格权、物权、知识产权、债权与其相对应的义务(债务)为此三个基本概念的下位概念,则可以推导出侵权行为产生的不是债而是民事责任,侵权行为法主要是绝对权的救济法,应当从债法中独立出来。侵权责任与违约责任共同组成一个完整的民事责任体系,实践着私法自治的功能。

On the Relationship among the Civil Right, Duty and Liability

Because the conventional civil law's theory can't answer the question which place the torts law takes,this article explicit that the civil right,civil duty and civil liability are in the same rank concept,and their relationship are"three in one"(trinity) in the same civil legal relationship.While the personal right,jus ad rem and intelligent property,and the duties (debts) that opposite at them are in the next rank of civil right.So torts result in the civil liabilities,and the tort law is the remedy law of the absolute right, we should separate the law of liability from the law of obligations.Therefore, the tortuous liabilities and the liabilities of breach contract consist a whole civil law liability system, which enforcing the functions of the self-rule of the civil law.