首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中德(日)量刑基准之比较研究
引用本文:肖世杰.中德(日)量刑基准之比较研究[J].法学家,2009(5).
作者姓名:肖世杰
作者单位:广州大学人权研究中心;中国社科院法学研究所;
摘    要:在德日刑法中,受责任主义的规制,责任为刑罚规定了前提和界限,基于预防方面的考量不能僭越责任程度所决定的刑罚。相比之下,中国现行刑法的量刑基准理论与之虽貌合实神离,因为作为其量刑基准的刑事责任的大小是社会危害性与人身危险性评价的加权之值。我国现行量刑基准理论实际上是现行刑事责任理论体系的逻辑延伸。欲求我国量刑基准理论在逻辑上更为科学合理,在价值取向上彰显现代刑法之人权保障机能,则必以改善现行刑事责任理论体系为前提。改造的重点在于纠正将责任评价与刑罚量定混为一体的做法,将之予以分离,使之各得其所。作为犯罪后果负担的刑事责任只能由犯罪的严重性程度来决定,人身危险性因素不能用于评价犯罪与刑事责任,而只能在刑罚最后量定时做有利于犯罪人更新改造之缓和考量。

关 键 词:量刑基准  刑事责任  社会危害性  人身危险性  

Comparative Study of Chinese and German-Japanese Criminal Theory on the Basis of Sentencing
XIAO Shijie Associate Professor of Human Rights Research Center at Guangzhou University,Post-Doctoral Staff of Institute of Law at Chinese Acadeny of Social Sciences.Comparative Study of Chinese and German-Japanese Criminal Theory on the Basis of Sentencing[J].Jurists Review,2009(5).
Authors:XIAO Shijie Associate Professor of Human Rights Research Center at Guangzhou University  Post-Doctoral Staff of Institute of Law at Chinese Acadeny of Social Sciences
Institution:XIAO Shijie Associate Professor of Human Rights Research Center at Guangzhou University,Post-Doctoral Staff of Institute of Law at Chinese Acadeny of Social Sciences
Abstract:In the criminal law theory in Continental Countries,criminal responsibility provides the criterion and the limit for punishment considering the principle of responsibility.The penality imposing on the criminal should never go beyond the limit decided by criminal responsibility.However,there is only something in common ostensibly in the theory of basis of imposing penality between Continental Countries and China.In Chinese criminal law theory,the criminal responsibility,as the basis of imposing penality,depe...
Keywords:The Basis of Sentencing  Criminal Responsibility  Social Harmfulness  Dangerousness of Criminal  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号