一个话题的继续——再论许霆案的定性

许霆第二次以及以后的取款行为与第一次取款行为并无本质区别。第二次以及以后的在ATM机上取款的行为具有社会相当性，不具备法益侵害的客观危险性，因此，不属于犯罪的实行行为。当第二次以后的取款行为完成后，银行的财产成为遗失物。许霆非法占有遗失物、拒不返还的行为构成侵占罪。

On the Crimination of the Criminal Case Committed by Xu Ting

There is no fundamental difference between Xu Ting's first and second withdrawal of money.His withdrawal of money after the second time has its social worthiness,but there is no objective dangerousness to the legal interest.Therefore,his acts can not be regarded as acts of perpetrating.However,after his second withdrawal,the money of the bank can be considered as lost property.Xu Ting illegally possessed the lost property and refused to return it.Hence,he committed the crime of embezzlement.