中国行政诉讼中的府院互动

近十五年来,府院互动活动在我国行政诉讼实践中的开展,更新了司法权与行政权关系的传统认知,促进了行政审判制度化解纠纷、支持与监督行政等功能的发挥,同时也存在运行规范性欠缺的问题。以审判为中心和实质性化解行政争议观念引领下的个案处理型府院互动,旨在实现纠纷解决的司法目标。合法性底线论和行政过程论观念引领下的法治促进型府院互动,旨在实现政策实施的司法目标。新时代行政诉讼府院互动的继续生长,既反映着人民法院对社会治理政策变迁的回应和优化司法环境的努力,也源于行政任务导向下司法功能适度拓展的需要。行政诉讼中府院互动积极功能的发挥,尚需从完善法解释适用、加强过程公开化和保障救济实效上完成法治建构,把中国特色行政审判制度的优势转化为国家治理效能。

Government-court Interaction in Chinese Administrative Litigation

In the recent 15 years,the development of government-court interaction in the practice of administrative litigation law in China has updated the traditional understanding of the relationship between judicial power and executive power,promoted the functions of the administrative trial system in resolving disputes and supporting and supervising administration.But at the same time,the problem of lack of operational norms also exists.Case-based government-court interaction under the guidance of the concept of trial-oriented and substantive resolution of administrative disputes aims to achieve the judicial goal of dispute resolution.Rule of law-enhancing government-court interaction promoted by the concept of legitimacy bottom line theory and administrative process theory aims to achieve the judicial goal of policy implementation.The continuous growth of this function in the new era not only reflects the response of the courts to changes in social governance policies and the efforts to optimize the judicial environment,but also stems from the need to moderately expand the judicial functions under the guidance of administrative tasks.In order to give full play to the positive function of government-court interaction,China needs to complete the construction of the rule of law in terms of the application of jurisprudential hermeneutic,the openness of process and the effectiveness of relief,so as to better transform the advantages of the administrative trial system with Chinese characteristics into the effectiveness of state governance.