Deception and Mutual Gains Bargaining: Are They Mutually Exclusive? |
| |
Authors: | Raymond A. Friedman Debra L. Shapiro |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) the Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, 37203 Nashville, Tenn;(2) the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carroll Hall, CB # 3490, 27599 Chapel Hill, N.C. |
| |
Abstract: | Conclusion We have made great strides in recent years teaching more people — in classrooms, corporate training sessions, and actual negotiations — about negotiations, including how to be more ethical and how to ensure that integrative joint gains are not left on the table. The fact that we even need to write an article like this is an indication of the advances that have been made.Yet exactly because of these advances, more care needs to be taken to ensure that the subtle distinction between what is ethical and what is integrative is maintained. Being ethical in negotiations is more complicated than producing greater joint utility, and the techniques that are helpful for producing greater joint utility should not be made more complicated by the addition of ethical concerns. Each issue — ethics and mutual gains bargaining — can stand on its own, and benefits by being considered on its own. By maintaining this distinction, we believe each will have greater clarity and greater impact, and our teaching and training will be both better received and more valuable to those we teach. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|