President Clinton's Fiscal 1998 Budget: Political and Constitutional Paths to Balance |
| |
| Authors: | Lance T LeLoup Carolyn N Long James N Giordano |
| |
| Institution: | Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4880. E-mail address: .;Assistant Professor of Political Science at Washington State University-Vancouver. E-mail address: .;Doctoral candidate in the Department of Political Science at Washington State University, E-mail address: . |
| |
| Abstract: | This article examines President Clinton's FY 98 budget proposals and the political and economic factors that led to the balanced budget agreement. Also explored are the constitutional approaches to fiscal discipline: the balanced budget amendment, the tax supermajority amendment, and the line item veto that was used 80 times by President Clinton to delete over a billion dollars. The analysis reveals that budget bargaining was continuous before and after the budget agreement was reached, moving downward from decisions on macro-budgetary totals to micro-budgetary choices on tax cuts and appropriations. The study concludes that President Clinton was relatively successful in achieving budgetary goals under divided government, that the agreement was significant despite the economic growth that made it easier, and that constitutional remedies will continue to be important in the coming years. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
