首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

解读高等学校的“法律法规授权的组织”资格——以田永诉北京科技大学案为范本展开的分析
引用本文:袁明圣. 解读高等学校的“法律法规授权的组织”资格——以田永诉北京科技大学案为范本展开的分析[J]. 行政法学研究, 2006, 0(2): 1-6
作者姓名:袁明圣
作者单位:江西财经大学法学院,江西,南昌,330013
摘    要:“法律法规授权的组织”是非行政机关被推上行政诉讼被告席的惟一事由,也是法院受理田永诉北京科技大学案,为学生打开司法救济之门的前提。然而,法院在田永一案中并没有证成高等学校具有“法律法规授权的组织”资格。尽管单方面性、强制性等是行政权的属性,但并非所有具有这些属性的权力都是行政权。

关 键 词:高等学校  法律法规授权的组织  行政诉讼  被告资格

On the Qualification of University as "An Organization Authorized by Law"
YUAN Ming-sheng. On the Qualification of University as "An Organization Authorized by Law"[J]. Administrative Law Review, 2006, 0(2): 1-6
Authors:YUAN Ming-sheng
Abstract:“An organization authorized by law” is the only basis of non-administrative organization (the school) sitting in the dock as defendant. It was also the precondition that the court take in TIAN Yong vs. University of Science & Technology as an administrative case. However, the court has not ever proven that school as “An organization authorized by law” adequately in this case. Administrative power has the character of unilateralism and compulsion, but not all having that is administrative power.
Keywords:University  Organization Authorized by Law  Administrative Litigation  Qualification as Defendant
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号